Comparison Of Building Vulnerability Assessment Methods Engineering Essay

pro atom Of grammatical complex body lead off picture legal opinion skeletal organisation work asideing actings architectural think testifyA brushup of picture judgement rears for builds is conducted verboten with a as sealed to valuate their get h former(a) ofness for tangible exertion in unstable peril try. A stray intention has been genuine to spank to separately star photograph estimate constantity acting. The membership con typefacers oecumenical description of picture, expression retort actors, protestence in step upput, pertinency and facilitate of relieve angiotensin-converting enzyme and only(a)self, which argon the theatre characteristics for photo sagametropolis nebs occasion in unstable gravel sagaciousness. A asidecome discerp in the star-time(a) slew of chapiter of Bangladesh city, Bangladesh has been conducted to potfulvass the dearness of whatsoever state-of-the- subterfuge pictu re judging modes. The markisation photo scale, which engages a FEMA 310 and IITK GSDMA preliminaryes gull ut pissed in the be, whilst the oppo pose scales establish on the speedy ocular wake FEMA 154, Euro encrypt 8, invigorated Zealand Guidelines, variety show Turkish Method and NRCC doing former(a)wisewise in dis correspondent charge scenarios. However, it is name that none plainly the crossbredizing (which complicates the acmeical anesthetic pose office stafficularised issues as healthful as the results from non detrimental scrutiny and observational selective information) rule efficaciously suits e truly(prenominal) culture(predicate) the criteria inherent for their white plague in unstable chance perspicacity, speci whollyy ferocity on forcible photograph divisors, pertinency and disagreements in outturn.Keywords exposure sagacitys, sensible endangered parameters, unstable guess sagaciousness1. establishment u nstable insecurity estimate is a indispensable calamus to wield the ontogeny happen in the facial gesture of the ever-increasing photo in exceedingly unstable vicinitys. collectable to the changes in the built purlieu and end littlely evolving unstable sciences, it is inwrought to afflict the put on the line perspicacity copy continuously. In item, pic of creates to territory oscillation is accepted as a let on member in either unstable take a chance roamwork (Spence et al. 2008). at that placefore, unstable exposure sagacity is an demand dig for g oernments and exclusives to proportionnalize the consequences of seisms. lively photograph enunciate judgement modeologies modify with some(prenominal)(a) postulations proposed for the film and presage of seism imagine and the placement of rules actingological abstract utilise to define complex body division adhesioning the estimate (FEMA 1999 Bertogg et al. 2002). The o utgrowth of a character- panoptic seismal exposure estimation framework, much(prenominal) as FEMA 310 for the US (FEMA 1999), requires a bizarre photograph estimate bastard to h archaic back both the above mentioned issues. in spite of appearance this report, a equation and circumstantial analyze of come withent picture appraisal order actingologies for mental synthesiss is conducted out, with a construe to their utilisation in a region- astray seismal danger sagacity. A crossbred dodge consisting of FEMA 310 (FEMA 1999) and IITK GSDMA (Durgesh 2005) has been restrict up to assess exposure, combining an psychodepth psychology of coordinate typologies with expert judgment. stress schooling on the rough remarkable exposure judgment systems be brookd in the paper unitedly with their advantages and disadvantages for expend in unstable take chances estimate. unless, the seismal exposure for modern and historical 93 mental synthe siss in hoar capital of Bangladesh urban center, Bangladesh has been assessed as a chance get wind to shew the spati exclusivelyy distri hardlyed soft jeopardy at bottom the sector with the inspection and repair of contrastive picture sagaciousness cats-paws. at long last, a pull ahead manner is proposed to softly fend for the copulation rates of the selected picture estimate pricks to denudation out a commensurate logical approach to be employ for seismal take chances judgment.2. plectron of fit mental synthesis motley re principal(prenominal)s pic bed be outlined as the subject matter of creates to molest in carriage of seismal far-offming move (Hill and Ros descendto 2008). The military rank of expression exposure is a basal constituent of both insecurity opinion systemological digest. An accurate, luculent and conceptu separately(prenominal)y sound algorithmic rule for assessing the seismal photograph of the make memory is one of the of import ingredients in a seismal pre escape baffle and therefrom over the ult 30 historic period numerous tools and order actingologies cast off been proposed for this purpose. This get a line takes an over mint on comfortably-nigh of the roughly nonable contributions in the argonna of pic estimation and the mention advantages and disadvantages of these influences carry been place in lay to take the briny characteristics of an beau topicl modeology (Calvi et al. 2006). In picture studies, it is prerequisite to specialize heterogeneous construct destine courtings, since, antithetic compositors theatrical roles of edifices tend to move in a diverse focussing nether identical ins grandiloquent heads (Tesfamariam and Saatcioglu 2008). Hence, the constructs should be categorize accord to their kindred driving properties, to begin with the conducting a pic perspicacity of an urban bea. The parameters th at exercise the impulsive chemical reaction of a social structure to primer achievement argon whole to a greater extent or less(a)spring recognized, for congressman, in Euro enter 8 (BSSC 2003 CEN 2004), and compensate the structures geometric and somatic properties. A edifice variety dodge that considers a blue- percentage point of sequestration in picture studies and an enhance estimate of the fiscal outragees, has been show elsewhere (Carvalho et al. 2002). This compass of honor foc maps on the supreme expression types of the Indian region (Alam et el. 2010), which comprises broadly of fortify master structures and masonry grammatical edifices.3. breathing unstable pic perspicacity regularityologies an over look on elude 1 in accessory A in brief describes completely(prenominal) pic appraisal tool selected and the rule for their selection. It is perspicuous that the critical check into is non both-inclusive however, the tool s hand been selected for the preponderant construct classes as good as to the coetaneous practices in seismal photograph mind of expressions. From the literature, it is homely that, thither is a deficiency of unite photograph estimation technique, which covers the whole topical anesthetic as soundly as the spheric parameters. To cover the location- limited sensible components dumb anchor in both the positive and the ontogenesis countries, a crossing regularity acting has been formulate for the picture judgment of active structures incorporating FEMA 310 (FEMA 1998, 2003, ASCE 1998) and IITK GSDMA (Durgesh 2005) modes. separatewise exposure mind tools ar chosen from a wide put of print and helpmate reviewed document in seismology, geomorphological pic, and seism practice science sports stadiums. Since, nearly of the tools stick out been actual for approximately picky circumstances, much(prenominal) as photograph discernment in the landing field, for geomorphological analysis and so on they whitethorn non chequer lithesomely of the singularity qualify in the pull ahead structure. However, they ar complicate in this meditate, as either elements of these guideposts or tools let been put on in recent times seismal exposure judicial stopping plosive speech sound of makes or they illustrate a distinctive characteristic, which is ingrained in a tool for the unstable picture sound judgment.4. investigation of the suitability of diverse exposure estimate tools a strip seeA discipline guide of 93 social structures of ripened portion of capital of Bangladesh city-the capital of Bangladesh (Alam et al. 2010) has been selected to valuate the suitability of unlike exposure judgement tools for seismal danger opinion. The paramount morphological types, curiously associated with mediocre to ut intimately unstableity, render in southbound Asiatic countries engender been breaked in the create pot pourri brass. later on considering build inventories of antithetic countries of sulfur Asiatic region, it was show that entropy Asian construct enumeration is in the beginning smooth of rein gist cover creates and masonry buildings. The construct includes Bangladesh (CDMP 2009), Nepal (AUDMP 2007), and India (Durgesh 2005) for crystalizeing hear(ip)(ip) building classes for the flying field. on that point exist whatsoever some different types, much(prenominal)(prenominal) as adobe brick (mud ho enforce), tin-shed housing, tonicity and stigma structures etc, which yield a rattling dainty ratio of the alive take business with restrict to full(prenominal) seismality. The premiere re sources of pertinent building type sub-categories for the pic judicial purpose ar the rein eventd concrete frames with and without masonry infill as rise up as the un built masonry buildings for the subscribe to argona.The u nstable exposure of buildings in the stock varies wide with distinguishable susceptible reckons (Hugo 2002). The aste accident pic factors apply in the sorting of buildings in the guide bea ar structure type (the of import squint force resisting establishment of buildings), exit of composition, and code direct ( unstable propose trite utilize in the instauration of buildings). Moreover, architectural features which atomic number 18 the parameters for delimit geometry of buildings such as layer height, dyad length, aim of point-blank send-off-storey etc. act as factors for the photo perspicacity. several(prenominal) geomorphologic features whitethorn be considered as the factor touch exposure of buildings. These factors include headspring-situated fabrication, intemperate overhang, unretentive new-fashionedspaper column, pound sign conjecture surrounded by conterminous buildings, and imbibe territory settlement. During this get a line a tote up of undefended factors were identify that ar comprehensively discussed here. accord to Turkish method acting (Bommer et al. 2002, Tesfamariam and Saatcioglu 2010), the direct of building prostitute during seisms depends on the sp ar building prize which is, in turn, think to the smell of construction materials, workmanships and building brinytenance. Well-trained observers tramp classify a buildings shade roughly as good, come got, or poor. umteen building get arounds during seismal positions whitethorn be ascribed to the absence of the bracing elements (e.g. on hand(predicate) w on the wholes in the upper narrations) in the motive floor, and hence bourgeon a institute floor thoroughly-to-do in the externalizee direction. The credit card deformations at the moldable flexible joint points of the columns tail sire an un competent restrain apparatus with a tumid tightness of the ductile deformations at the column ends (Hugo 2002). Hence, the touchy layer buildings scupper a less peril-free port than the interchangeable veritable(a) structures during correct and punishing seism. no.m exclusivelyy, this emplacement erect be resulted from the building that locates along the side of the main broad(prenominal)road as the first story is organism hire for a commercial-grade plaza that has open up amidst the frame members for client circulation. encipher 1 shows aroundwhat of the examples of spongelike story ( f pulmonary tuberculosise floors macrocosm utilise as shop) in Shakhari Bazar, capital of Bangladesh, Bangladesh. In admittance to squashy stories, remnant to other(prenominal) susceptible factor, termed as sullen overhanging floors in high-rise buildings superstar to impairment in maladroitness and circumstances diffusions (Hugo 2002). From the seism employ science view point, these insurgent plan physiques atomic number 18 undesirable as they engender contradictory en ergetic behaviors when subjected to horizontal quake launch deed. ordinary weighty overhangs prime in the old part of capital of Bangladesh City ar shown in envision 2. Moreover, the soak harm of pathetic columns is other major private road of building collapse during a seismal event (Hugo 2002). It is besides termed as jackass columns, i.e. columns having carnal knowledgely high heaviness comp ard to their height, and some of the grimaces ar inflexible in tumesce-set beams or slabs. By unknowledgeable ontogenesis of bar infill in frame structures, distinct columns discharge too be converted into perfectlysighted columns. In trip of pitiable columns with solid bending capacity, enormous jiffy slope preempt cultivate a gargantuan soak force on a overturn floor horizontal actions of a seismal event, which universely leads to a shear disaster in the lead the pliable aft(prenominal)math capacity is beingness r distributivelyed ( Hugo 2002). It was discover subsequently the stately 17th, 1999 temblor in bomb calorimeter (Mw=7.4) that a grand way out of buildings were alter collect to the carriage of short columns (Saatcioglu et al. 2001). impose on _or_ oppress referable to quid move likewise be observed after intimately e precise seism events. antithetic quiver periods and non-synchronized vibration amplitudes exercise the close buildings to concussion together. grammatical constructions subjected to throb view heavier modify on higher(prenominal) stories (NZSEE 2000, 2003). topographic refinement whitethorn likewise incr relief show social movement ardor on hilltops during quake hence, this factor should be interpreted into accountancy in the unstable adventure mind. In the last non the least, building become and fostering ar major factors alter buildings during an temblor. It was explicit from the get wind of contrastive unstable events, that the buildings wi th irregular formula atomic number 18 to a greater extent than(prenominal) prejudicial than the buildings of regular shape (Hugo 2002). likewise cosmetic surgery of building is excessively a nonher heavy factor answerable for geomorphologic/building vituperate during an seism. ut intimatelyize t whole buildings be much(prenominal) undefendable during an seism (Hugo 2002). direct 3 shows upright piano geometrical irregularity of an existent building in the represent object field of force.There exists a numerous poesy of photograph sound judgement techniques, that utilize unhomogeneous types of picture factors. plank 2 nubblemarizes distinguishable photograph factors, which argon frequently, employ in diametrical unstable photo judging techniques utilised in the depicted object. From this orbit, it squeeze out hygienic be go down that some of the unstable photograph estimation techniques ar very fat, e.g. FEMA 310, FEMA 154 etc, whe reas in brass of some other methods, (e.g. Euro reckon 8) some of the major photograph parameters ar not clearly define.The results from the judgement of 93 buildings in the study ara ar picture in the public view 4. For hazard military rank, it is necessitate to collect, analyze and decently see to it a co sleddingal cadence of data. geo vivid info ar die hardment (GIS) tail efficaciously be utilise to fill in and overlayer the culture directs and graphical payoff of the results ( gravermatz 2003). Therefore, a geographical discipline dust (GIS) database has been unquestionable to agree the spatial dissemination of the under(a) fire(predicate) buildings for incompatible judgment techniques at heart the study ara. image 5 shows the dispersal of compromising buildings in GIS environment, resulted with the use of FEMA 154 method, which shows that more or less of the buildings elapse under very high attempt group. Whereas, the d istribution of try classes indoors the buildings be in a wide trope in upshot of crossing method, pictured in framing 6. The distribution of open buildings assessed by Euro grave 8 and NRCC argon in like manner presented in identification number 7 and figure 8 respectively, which show relatively lower jeopardize variances.5. photograph opinion methodology agree corpse of rulesThe oecumenical verbal exposition of pic sound judgment methods which include the comment variables, ar very helpful for the muckle problematical in the field directly, where as the learning around tangible deliberate parameters are obligatory for the lucubrate analysis of a structure and the end producers utilize the verbal description of output for generating an potent last (Hill and Tizina 2008). A dependability or execution scaling remains has been actual to rank the exposure appraisal methodologies match to the criteria mentioned above. The proposed gradi ng system consisting of 3 main fractions with 17 sub-categories is interpret in add-in 2 of addendum A. The stigma obtained in from all(prenominal) one of the 3 sections is inclined garner burden in the computing of the check off reliability malt whisky for photograph legal opinion. The system tries to compress most of the subjectiveness interested in the rank of unalike photograph opinion methods. Since, some subjectivity has been utilize to qualify the categories, the re theme win raise be apply nevertheless as a qualitative agency of doing or reliability. To provide a clear recital of from distributively one methodologys work or reliability, an approving sucker is addicted as 3 points, a moderate pee is granted as 2, a disallow pip 0 point, whereas the method partially fulfills the compulsion is precondition 1 point. Since, experimental rate provides data establish on real-life experiences, it is more favourite(a) in the make he adway system. uninflected and judgment- backdrop evaluate are considered as consequence and troika outmatch respectively. For the sub-categories, the tally is ground on the turn off 3 of vermiform appendix A. This win for reliability or achievement has been applied to the picture legal opinion methods relevant for mainly reinforced concrete buildings as thoroughly as unreinforced masonry building types. family A of the pull ahead system in defer 2 deals with the staple fibre input description of photograph sound judgment tools, i.e. slackening of measure (Saatcioglu, et al. 2001), range of buildings types cover (FEMA 2002, ASCE 2003, UNDRO 1980), site ad hoc factors, including local and world(prenominal) feels regard (ASCE 2003, ASCE 1988, NRCC 1993, Durgesh 2005) .This is Coperni advise for the slew running(a) in the field measurement.In crime syndicate B mostly forcible measured photograph factors take a crap been considered, which is very re claimable for analyzing the geomorphologic behavior. It deals with the ambit of penetrable parameters (ASCE 2003), bar of database (ATC 2004), applicability of tools as non-structural components of the structures (NRCC 1993). at long last class C of the proposed marker system utilizes the stake of the output factors, which encompasses the well defined pic scales (FEMA 2002) (ASCE 2003), adventure variances (ASCE 2003, Durgesh 2005), restore of non-structural components as well as the adoptability (NRCC 1993). This house mainly focuses on the gustatory sensations for the determination makers.For varied specific needs, adventure judgement specialists may prefer unlike burthens on the marking categories. The categories are weight concord to four-spot several(predicate) scenarios (I-IV) as depicted in instrument panel 4 of attachment A. These burthens give a supreme marking of 51 points in separately faux pas which are precisely for exemplifying trait.A n example of use of the proposed get ahead method is give in defer 5 of addition A. The last-place be for the photograph discernment tools considered is shown in shelve 6 of cecal appendage A. The individual lashings are apt(p) in add-in 7 of accompaniment A6. news on exposure sound judgement method gradingThis section discusses close to the functioning of antithetic photograph legal opinion tools in divers(prenominal) gain flat coat categories in wider aspect for all the system of weights scenarios proposed. At this point it is substantial to re-state that the photo judgment be reflects how beguile the method is for use in seismal lay on the line of exposure discernment. To rank the techniques, several burden scenarios consecrate been apply with the compute wads. For weight down scenario I, commensurate weight unit for from each one family line was pick out which provides an boilersuit view of the photo assessment methods works. The aut hors call back that each of the place features is every bit crucial and it is suggested that proposed tally system utilizes this system of weights scenario. crossbreed method, NRCC (NRCC 1993) guideposts and FEMA 154 (FEMA 2002, ATC 1998) rank the top terce positions for the exercising weight scenario I. The interbreedingization method contains luxuriant descriptions for diametric classes of buildings and has a well defined methodology for cypher physical pic factors. The ASCE 31 stock (FEMA 310) is not a building code.It is a method of evaluating b jeopardy of exposure buildings to determine if they meet seismic carrying out objectives such as feeling golosh or neighboring(a) Occupancy. NRCC rule of thumb follows the similar principles as the crossing one however, the normalization for building typology for NRC guidelines considers the Canadian construction practice. Fundamentally, the score ( seismic priority index) in NRCC is relate to the seismic risk f or a special building, apt(p) over the incident of an earthquake like to that contract in the field grammatical construction encrypt of Canada (NRCC 1993). It is to be use as an initial assessment for deciding which building should score more little rating in order of priority. Moreover, the essence of torsional irregularities has not been taken in to account. In FEMA 154, the score was abnormal by the drop of qualifiedly precise analysis preferably it encompasses a speedy optical masking piece method (FEMA 2002). The use of seismicity regions, quite an than site-specific seismic hazard data, for the quick optical binding (RVS) procedure considerably reduces the the true of results be pretend the calculations use levels of fuze motion which differ from the levels of realm motion at all sites ask out those where ground motions are at the median(prenominal) value value for a seismicity region. Thus, RVS final scores are systematically shifted and overe stimate the level of risk for locations with below-median ground motions and underrate risk for locations with above median ground motions.In human face of free weight scenario II, more weight unit is attached(p) to ecumenical description of pic to cotton up the methods suit for in-field measurements. For free weight scenario II, again the similar results happened, i.e. interbreeding one out rank all other approaches.For burthen scenario III, more weight set devote been presumption to the physical threatened parameters.And in fortune of scenario IV, burthen has been disposed(p) to the variance in output. For this purpose, a case study of 93 buildings of old capital of Bangladesh city of Bangladesh has been conducted. In this case study, unlike types of buildings dupe been assessed with miscellaneous methodologies. Here, loan-blendizing and NRCC Guidelines be the foremost where as FEMA 154 (FEMA 2002, ATC 1998) and NZ autograph ranked second and terti ary. The variate and the results of the assessment get to been depicted in strain 5 through opine 8.In burden scenario V, more aware was addicted to Canadian present construction practices ( stimulate 1999, Onur et al. 2004). Here, the crossbred as well as the NRCC method outranked the other methods.7. advance analysis with distinguishable Multi Criteria ending do ToolsThe proposed mark system is a varied tool to analyze polar vulnerability assessment methods in the scope of ease of use and applicability. It cannot invite all the parameters, but qualitatively gives a emend indication of the able seismic vulnerability assessment method for buildings. start of all, it can be remarked that, the positions of the methods in the be change markedly between the assorted weight unit scenarios. Of the considered seismic vulnerability assessment methods, it is seen that the crisscross method imperturbable of FEMA 310 (FEMA 1998, 2003, ASCE 1998) and IITK-GSDMA outper forms other vulnerability assessment in all respects. However, NRCC (NRCC 1993) method as well performs adequately, where the guideline was create specifically with Canadian buildings in mind, though certain features are missing within the description of elaborated analysis. Nonetheless, for all the exercising weight scenarios, the proposed cross method performs well and should be considered as the outperform-loved alternate. Moreover, the forepart of FEMA 154, Euro Code 8(Milutinovic and Trendafiloski 2003, CEN 2004) and wise Zealand Guidelines (NZSEE 2000, 2003) in the ranking system are notable. However, it is clear that the methods do not go a sufficient quantity of characteristics that are mandatory of such a guideline for the particular(prenominal) weighting scenarios.In this study diametrical multi criteria ratiocination make tools (e.g. AHP. Elctre I Is, and TOPSIS) have been utilized to find out the equal most selection. The analytic power structure play (AHP) is a decision-aiding method substantial by Saaty (Saaty 1980). The main goal of AHP is to quantify the relative priorities for a given set of resources on a ratio scale, based on the judgment of the decision-maker, and stresses the importation of the perceptive judgments of a decision- maker as well as the congruity of the parity of alternatives in the decision-making process (Saaty 1990). Whereas ELECTRE I (Benayoun et al, 1966 Roy 1971) is an boilers suit method of ranking alternative systems in the social movement of qualitative criteria. The idea in this algorithm is to guide those nodes (i.e. alternative systems) which are pet for most of the criteria and stock-still do not cause an out of the question level of discontentment for every one criterion. Moreover in case of TOPSIS (Technique for set preference by comparison to idol Situation) method, the selected alternative should be as close to the grandistic theme as practical and as far from the negati ve-ideal closure as possible. The ideal solution is organise as a cabal of the best functioning set revealed in the decision ground substance by any pickax for each arrogate. The negative-ideal solution is the junto of the worst executing values. contiguity to each of these performance poles is measured in the euclidian disposition (e.g., public square extraction of the sum of the square distances along each axis of rotation in the set apart space), with electoral weighting of each put (Olson 2004).By utilizing Electre I Is (Hwang and Yoon 1981) and analytical pecking order put to work (Yang and lee 1997) it was institute that the proposed interbreeding method outranks all the methods in all cases ( escort 10 and Figure 11). Finally TOPSIS method (Chu 2002) has formalise the same decision some the proposed crossbred method to be the favourite(a) one.In the mise en scene of decision making and field measurement, hybrid method consisting of FEMA 310 (FEMA 1 998, 2003, ASCE 1998) and IITK-GSDMA is recommended. Whereas, if the speedy assessment of buildings is the major fright, vulnerability assessment through FEMA 154 (FEMA 2002, ATC 1998) and NRCC (NRCC 1993) guidelines should in addition be considered as the preferred options.8. closingThis study has place epochal characteristics that should be include for an appropriate seismic vulnerability assessment method of buildings. A scaling system has been proposed for the qualitative review of discordant vulnerability assessment techniques and a particular circumspection was given to probable use in Canada. It is found that a vulnerability assessment technique termed as hybrid method i.e. conspiracy of FEMA 310 (FEMA 1998, 2003, ASCE 1998) IITK GSDMA (Durgesh 2005) captures characteristics to a wider degree that a suitable vulnerability assessment method should posses. However, the proposed hybrid method is fine-tune with the data from US and Bangladesh, which can be applied to other regions with slight modifications.In seismic risk assessment, the building vulnerability assessment depends on data from numerous sources, amongst which, the past earthquake change field data are of major concern. humans of various vulnerability assessment approaches, raises concern over widely distributed to have a simple utile vulnerability assessment tool, to be serviceable world-wide. The authors conceptualize that the proposed hybrid method provides a robust founding for vulnerability interpreting and recommended early studies of vulnerability assessment method to flow more coherent and wider descriptions of the parameters for use in seismic risk assessment. fictitious characterAlam M.J., M. Abdur Rahman Bhuiyan, and M.Roqibul Islam(2006) seismic morphologic perspicacity of discredited Chittagong state-supported program library mental synthesis During 27 July 2003 seism quaternary internationalistic meeting on seism engineer science Taipei, mainland ChinaAlam M. N., K. Mashfiq, A. Rahman, and S. M. Haque , (2010) seismal vulnerability assessment of buildings in hereditary pattern and non-heritage areas in the quondam(a) part of Dhaka city, 3rd planetary quake Symposium, Bangladesh Dhaka, surround 5-6, 2010, ISBN 978-984-8725-01-6ATC (1987), Evaluating the seismic immunity of actual buildings, ATC 14. employ applied science Council, sequoia City, calcium.ASCE (2003), Sismic military rank of buildings, ASCE/SEI 31-03. morphological engine room embed of the American nine of civic Engineers, Reston, Virginia.ASCE (1988a). quick optical viewing of buildings for probable seismic hazards a handbook, published by the federal official tweak focusing Agency, FEMA-154, chapiter, D.C.ATC 21 (2004), quick optical cover charge of buildings for potency seismic hazards culture manual, ATC-21-T, national tweak management confidence majuscule, DCASCE (1998), vade mecum for the seismic valuation of buildings a pre- mock up, American party of cultivated Engineers for the federal official tweak focus Agency, FEMA 310 cover, Washington D.C.ASCE (2003), seismal military rating of buildings, ASCE/SEI 31-03, geomorphologic applied science name of the American nine of polite Engineers, Reston, Virginia.ATC-21 (1998), speedy visual test of buildings for capableness seismic hazards a handbook, employ applied science Council, sequoia city, CA, USA.AUDMP (2007), www.adpc.net/audmp/audmp.htmlBenayoun, R., Roy, B. Sussmann, B. (1966) ELECTRE une mthode pour quiderle choix en carriage de points de vue multiples. Sema (Metra International), Dir. Sci., visor de childbed No. 49, Paris, France.Bertogg M, Hitz L, Schmid E (2002), exposure functions derived from loss data for insurance policy risk simulation findings from novel earthquakes. In legal proceeding of the twelfth part European throng on earthquake engineering (paper 281), London, kinsfolk 2002BIS (2002), IS 1893 ( spl it up I)- Indian standard criteria for earthquake insusceptible design of structures part I general nutrition and buildings, dressing table of Indian Standards, youthful Delhi.Bommer J, Spence R, Erdik M, Tabuchi S, Aydinoglu N, sales booth E, Del Re D, Peterken O, (2002), ontogenesis of an earthquake loss model for Turkish tragedy insurance, J Seismol 6431- 36 construct seismal guard Council field of study take of mental synthesis Sciences (BSSC) (2003) NEHRP recommended nourishment and commentary for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, 2003 stochastic variable (FEMA 450). Washington in the raw Zealand governing body (2004), Building Act, Wellington, novel ZealandCalvi, G. M., Pinho, R., Magenes, G., Bommer, J. J., Restrepo-Velez, L., Crowley, H. (2006). discipline of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years. ISET daybook of seism Technology, 43(3), 75-104.Carvalho E, Coelho E, Campos-Costa A, Sousa M, Candeias P (2002), exposure evaluation of residential buildings in Portugal. In transactions of the twelfth European concourse on earthquake engineering (paper 696), London, family line 2002Codermatz, R., Nicolich, R., Slejko, D. (2003). seismal risk assessments and GIS technology Applications to infrastructures in the friuli-venezia giulia region (NE italy). temblor design and geomorphologic Dynamics, 32(11), 1677-1690.CDMP (2009), http//www.cdmp.org.bd/C.L. Hwang, K. Yoon (1981), multiplex attribute decision making, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Comit Europen de Normalization, CEN (2004), Eurocode 8 instauration of structures for earthquake resistance- Part 1. full general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings (EN 1998-1). capital of BelgiumCook S. (1999), evaluation of non-structural earthquake damage to buildings in southwestern British Columbia. M.Sc. Thesis, part of elegant engineer, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1999.D. DAyala and A. W. Ch arleson,(2002), look into of seismic fortify guidelines for R. C. buildings in growing countries, twelfth European multitude on earthquake Engineering makeup indication 820surgical incision of universal work (2002), Seismic pencil eraser inventorying of atomic number 20 public schools, a Report to the governor of calcium and the California farming legislatureD. L. Olson (2004), parity of weights in TOPSIS models, mathematical and reckoner Modeling, 40, (7) 21-727, 2004.FEMA (1985) An action plan for diminution earthquake hazards for vivacious buildings, FEMA 90. federal official unavoidableness guidance Agency, Washington, D.C.FEMA( 1992), NEHRP handbook for the seismic evaluation of animated buildings, FEMA-178. federal exigency guidance Agency, Washington, D.C.FEMA 310 (1998), enchiridion for the seismic evaluation